Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Performance benchmark · measured on 09.08.2026 11:34

Benchmark-IDrun-20260809-110714-c7ae95
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE35BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Public note: Arc B70 SYCL fw70.72 Qwen3.6-35B-A3B Q4_K_M c5 [1 verbaut,1 genutzt]
Configuration note: Es sind 2 Grafikkarten installiert, aber nur 1 wurde fuer diesen Lauf genutzt. Mit allen 2 GPUs koennte der Durchsatz deutlich hoeher liegen.
For context: Diese Plattform nutzt Unified Memory – die "VRAM" ist gemeinsamer System-RAM (APU/Superchip); das Modell teilt sich den Speicher mit dem System.
Generation82,07tok/s
Prefill382,70tok/s
Time to First Token4.502,00ms
Total duration8,60s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
7of 10 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 33 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 82,1 tok/s
-47 % vs Ø 154,9
Prefill 382,7 tok/s
-63 % vs Ø 1.026,9
Time to First Token 4.502 ms
-86 % vs Ø 32.035
Distribution in the field18 – 436 tok/s
Ø 155 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: Intel Arc Pro B70 · 32 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics
RAM: 61 GB
Mainboard: Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series)

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Driver: Intel 26.18.38308.4
Model: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260809-110714-c7ae95
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3.6-35B-A3B # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260809-110714-c7ae95 # GPU : Intel Arc Pro B70 # CPU : AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics # RAM : 61 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /root/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /root/models/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ --alias qwen3.6-35b-a3b-q4 \ -c 2048 \ -ngl 99
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.qwen3.6-35b-a3b-q4
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.2048
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./root/models/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q4_K_M.gguf
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.2048
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.99

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

1.9351.4519674840,005.20710.41415.621Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.489,1 tok/s Generation, 12.607 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.168 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.409,4 tok/s Generation, 4.912 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.113 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.367,3 tok/s Generation, 6.432 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.005 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 852,0 tok/s Generation, 3.423 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.930 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 800,4 tok/s Generation, 11.326 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.649 ms (30 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 296,2 tok/s Generation, 3.120 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.797 ms (18 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 271,4 tok/s Generation, 3.025 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 22.003 ms (32 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB - 235,5 tok/s Generation, 4.679 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.874 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7800 ...Tesla V100-PCIE-32GB - 225,9 tok/s Generation, 975 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.633 ms (3 Laufe)Tesla V100-PCIE-32GBNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) - 167,1 tok/s Generation, 4.210 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.687 ms (8 Laufe)NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spar...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 142,9 tok/s Generation, 499 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 32.007 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 98,3 tok/s Generation, 863 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.646 ms (13 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 27,5 tok/s Generation, 62 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 180.818 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 20...CPU-only - 4,3 tok/s Generation, 62 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.435 ms (1 Lauf)CPU-onlyIntel Arc Pro B70 - 124,5 tok/s Generation, 578 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.272 ms (7 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Intel Arc Pro B70
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.489,1 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.409,4 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.367,3 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 852,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 800,4 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 296,2 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 271,4 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB 235,5 tok/sTesla V100-PCIE-32GB 225,9 tok/sNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 167,1 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 142,9 tok/s★ Intel Arc Pro B70 124,5 tok/s this runAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 98,3 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 27,5 tok/sCPU-only 4,3 tok/s

CPUby processor

1.9351.4519674840,005.20710.41415.621Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.489,1 tok/s Generation, 12.607 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.168 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.409,4 tok/s Generation, 4.912 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.113 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.367,3 tok/s Generation, 6.432 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.005 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 852,0 tok/s Generation, 3.431 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.717 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor - 830,5 tok/s Generation, 3.419 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.537 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-C...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 800,4 tok/s Generation, 7.042 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.485 ms (62 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 296,2 tok/s Generation, 3.069 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.493 ms (33 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE w/ Radeon Vega Graphics - 225,9 tok/s Generation, 975 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.633 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G...NVIDIA Grace - 167,1 tok/s Generation, 4.210 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.687 ms (8 Laufe)NVIDIA GraceAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 98,3 tok/s Generation, 863 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.646 ms (13 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz - 27,5 tok/s Generation, 62 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 180.818 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 4,3 tok/s Generation, 62 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.435 ms (1 Lauf)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics - 124,5 tok/s Generation, 578 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.272 ms (7 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX wi...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.489,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.409,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.367,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 852,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 830,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 800,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 296,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE w/ Radeon Vega Graphics 225,9 tok/sNVIDIA Grace 167,1 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 124,5 tok/s this runAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 98,3 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz 27,5 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 4,3 tok/s

MBby mainboard

1.9301.4489654830,005.20710.41415.621Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.489,1 tok/s Generation, 12.607 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.168 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.409,4 tok/s Generation, 4.912 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.113 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.367,3 tok/s Generation, 6.964 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.395 ms (71 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 852,0 tok/s Generation, 3.431 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.717 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K - 830,5 tok/s Generation, 3.419 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.537 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 296,2 tok/s Generation, 3.069 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.493 ms (33 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING - 225,9 tok/s Generation, 975 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.633 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 - 167,1 tok/s Generation, 4.210 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.687 ms (8 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 98,3 tok/s Generation, 863 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.646 ms (13 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 27,5 tok/s Generation, 62 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 143.472 ms (4 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) - 124,5 tok/s Generation, 578 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.272 ms (7 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Shenzhen Meigao Elect...
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.489,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.409,4 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.367,3 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 852,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K 830,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 296,2 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING 225,9 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 167,1 tok/s★ Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) 124,5 tok/s this runBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 98,3 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 27,5 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.7701.4651.1608555501.4414.3787.31610.254Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 952,8 tok/s Generation, 8.704 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.451 ms (48 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 830,5 tok/s Generation, 2.991 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.522 ms (10 Laufe)unbekanntllama.cpp - 1.489,1 tok/s Generation, 3.246 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.493 ms (99 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.489,1 tok/s this runvLLM 952,8 tok/sunbekannt 830,5 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.9201.4409604800,002.1284.2556.383Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.489,1 tok/s Generation, 5.231 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.079 ms (138 Laufe)unbekanntNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 - 167,1 tok/s Generation, 4.210 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.687 ms (8 Laufe)NVIDIA 590.48.01 / CU...AMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 79,4 tok/s Generation, 2.349 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.000 ms (4 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-genericIntel 26.18.38308.4 - 124,5 tok/s Generation, 578 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.272 ms (7 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Intel 26.18.38308.4
unbekannt 1.489,1 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 167,1 tok/s★ Intel 26.18.38308.4 124,5 tok/s this runAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 79,4 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 0 W
⚡ TDP 230 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)230 W estimated (TDP)GPU 230 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.069
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.23
Token / kWh1.28M
Acquisition (system)EUR 1,378 partial priceGPU EUR 1,258 · PSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 2,587
Output tokens (2 years)5.18B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (0 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen3.6-35B-A3BIntel Arc Pro B70Qwen3.6-35B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen3.6-35B-A3B3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionQwen3.6-35B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.