Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaGoogle

gemma-4-12B-it

Performance benchmark · measured on 26.08.2026 22:09

Benchmark-IDrun-20260826-201356-091000
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense12BRuntime: vLLMQuantisierung: FP8
Generation41,69tok/s
Prefill3.676,76tok/s
Time to First Token537,50ms
Total duration50,20s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
852of 1576 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 46 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 41,7 tok/s
-47 % vs Ø 78,5
Prefill 3.676,8 tok/s
+31 % vs Ø 2.817,3
Time to First Token 538 ms
-98 % vs Ø 27.239
Distribution in the field0 – 405 tok/s
Ø 79 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA RTX A6000 · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: vLLM
Quantization: FP8
Model: gemma-4-12B-it

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260826-201356-091000
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : gemma-4-12B-it # Engine : vLLM # Run-ID : run-20260826-201356-091000 # GPU : NVIDIA RTX A6000 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ vllm serve \ --model gemma-4-12B-it
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.vllm
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.gemma-4-12B-it

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

gemma-4-12B-it on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

1.4261.0707133570,002.6225.2437.865Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.104,3 tok/s Generation, 4.570 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.144 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.058,9 tok/s Generation, 3.140 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.383 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.041,8 tok/s Generation, 5.150 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.222 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 677,5 tok/s Generation, 3.217 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.812 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 654,9 tok/s Generation, 2.298 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.684 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB - 202,0 tok/s Generation, 1.399 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.364 ms (11 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7800 ...Tesla V100-PCIE-32GB - 186,2 tok/s Generation, 1.307 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.582 ms (6 Laufe)Tesla V100-PCIE-32GBNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 89,8 tok/s Generation, 779 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.058 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 20...NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB - 45,8 tok/s Generation, 312 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 33.496 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCI...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 681,8 tok/s Generation, 6.388 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.274 ms (35 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX A6000
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.104,3 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.058,9 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.041,8 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX A6000 681,8 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 677,5 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 654,9 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB 202,0 tok/sTesla V100-PCIE-32GB 186,2 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 89,8 tok/sNVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB 45,8 tok/s

CPUby processor

1.4261.0707133570,002.6225.2437.865Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.104,3 tok/s Generation, 4.570 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.144 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.058,9 tok/s Generation, 3.140 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.383 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.041,8 tok/s Generation, 5.150 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.222 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 677,5 tok/s Generation, 2.040 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.463 ms (17 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 654,9 tok/s Generation, 2.617 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.920 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor - 372,4 tok/s Generation, 1.979 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.448 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-C...AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE w/ Radeon Vega Graphics - 186,2 tok/s Generation, 1.307 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.582 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G...Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7400 CPU @ 3.00GHz - 89,8 tok/s Generation, 779 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.058 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-...AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics - 45,8 tok/s Generation, 312 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 33.496 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 681,8 tok/s Generation, 6.388 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.274 ms (35 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.104,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.058,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.041,8 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 681,8 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 677,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 654,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 372,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE w/ Radeon Vega Graphics 186,2 tok/sIntel(R) Core(TM) i5-7400 CPU @ 3.00GHz 89,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 45,8 tok/s

MBby mainboard

1.4261.0707133570,002.5175.0347.551Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.104,3 tok/s Generation, 4.570 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.144 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.058,9 tok/s Generation, 3.140 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.383 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 677,5 tok/s Generation, 2.040 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.463 ms (17 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 654,9 tok/s Generation, 2.617 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.920 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K - 372,4 tok/s Generation, 1.979 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.448 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING - 186,2 tok/s Generation, 1.307 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.582 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASRock H110 Pro BTC+ - 89,8 tok/s Generation, 779 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.058 ms (3 Laufe)ASRock H110 Pro BTC+Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) - 45,8 tok/s Generation, 312 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 33.496 ms (3 Laufe)Shenzhen Meigao Elect...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.041,8 tok/s Generation, 6.135 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.672 ms (44 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.104,3 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.058,9 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.041,8 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 677,5 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 654,9 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K 372,4 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING 186,2 tok/sASRock H110 Pro BTC+ 89,8 tok/sShenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) 45,8 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.2991.0968936904871.1543.9396.7249.509Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 1.104,3 tok/s Generation, 2.615 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.509 ms (61 Laufe)llama.cppvLLM - 681,8 tok/s Generation, 8.048 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.219 ms (24 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ vLLM
llama.cpp 1.104,3 tok/s★ vLLM 681,8 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

1.2151.1601.1041.0499943.9004.0664.2324.398Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.104,3 tok/s Generation, 4.149 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.733 ms (85 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.104,3 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 80 W
⚡ TDP 371 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)371 W estimated (TDP)GPU 300 + CPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.11
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.74
Token / kWh404.54K
Acquisition (system)EUR 8,424 full priceGPU EUR 3,000 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 10,374
Output tokens (2 years)2.63B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (80 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

gemma-4-12B-itNVIDIA RTX A6000gemma-4-12B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090gemma-4-12B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Editiongemma-4-12B-it3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.