🏆
Rankings
LLM Leaderboard
Real measurements of every tested language model on real, named hardware – rated by raw speed (performance in tokens per second, prefill and time to first token) and by practical task quality in complete agent and chat runs (harness). Pick a benchmark type below or filter by model, maker and hardware to see exactly what is tested and how the results are produced.
⚡ Performance (tok/s)🤖 Harness quality👥 Concurrency🖥️ real hardware
| # | Model / Maker | Metrics | Parallel | GPU / CPU / RAM | Runtime | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507Qwen (Alibaba) PerformancebenchmarkTimebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation) | 8,52 tok/s TG Prefill 71 · TTFT 152.830 ms | 5× | Keine GPU (CPU-only)51x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz · 504 GB RAM | llama.cppgodclawQ4_K_M | Details → | |
| 2 | Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507Qwen (Alibaba) PerformancebenchmarkTimebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation) | 6,64 tok/s TG Prefill 73 · TTFT 33.548 ms | 1× | Keine GPU (CPU-only)51x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz · 504 GB RAM | llama.cppgodclawQ4_K_M | Details → | |
| 3 | Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507Qwen (Alibaba) PerformancebenchmarkTimebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation) | 0,58 tok/s TG Prefill 77 · TTFT 216.585 ms | 10× | Keine GPU (CPU-only)51x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz · 504 GB RAM | llama.cppgodclawQ4_K_M | Details → |